I fail to see how making people aware of something that sounds a bit suss should get edited off a thread, the thread then being closed for further comment.
There are dozens of couriers out there who look on this and other forums for advice AND for warnings of those to avoid and mistrust.
When a number of experienced couriers start questioning the ethics of another, surely we have the right to voice an opinion, and ask questions of whoever it is we're referrring too.
They then have the right to reply, and to justify what it is they're doing or being accused of.
To edit out legitimate information, that is out there for all to see (if they know where to look) is a bit like big brother don't you think?
With all the factual information infront of you, you can then make a decision whether you want to deal with that person(s) or choose to ignore and carry on
When I see a Company, whose directors have been involved in several other Businesses that are dissolved, then I get suspicious. One or two could be put down to bad luck, but when we get into double figures then it starts looking suss.
Due diligence i call it